Stanford Poll: Large majority of Americans support government solutions to global warming
Three out of four Americans believe that the Earth has been gradually warming as the result of human activity and want the government to institute regulations to stop it, according to a new survey by Stanford's Woods Institute for the Environment.
Three out of four Americans believe that the Earth has been gradually warming as the result of human activity and want the government to institute regulations to stop it, according to a new survey by researchers at the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University.
The survey was conducted by Woods Institute Senior Fellow Jon Krosnick, a professor of communication and of political science at Stanford, with funding from the National Science Foundation. The results are based on telephone interviews conducted June 1-7 with 1,000 randomly selected American adults.
"Several national surveys released during the last eight months have been interpreted as showing that fewer and fewer Americans believe that climate change is real, human-caused and threatening to people," Krosnick said. "But our new survey shows just the opposite."
For example, when respondents in the June 2010 survey were asked if the Earth's temperature probably had been heating up over the last 100 years, 74 percent said yes. And 75 percent said that human behavior was mainly responsible for any warming that has occurred.
"Our surveys reveal a small decline in the proportion of people who believe global warming has been happening, from 84 percent in 2007 to 74 percent today," Krosnick said. "Statistical analysis of our data revealed that this decline is attributable to perceptions of recent weather changes by the minority of Americans who have been skeptical about climate scientists."
In terms of average Earth temperature, 2008 was the coldest year since 2000, Krosnick said. "Scientists say that such year-to-year fluctuations are uninformative, and people who trust scientists therefore ignore this information when forming opinions about global warming's existence," he added. "But people who do not trust climate scientists base their conclusions on their personal observations of nature. These 'low-trust' individuals were especially aware of the recent decline in average world temperatures; they were the ones in our survey whose doubts about global warming have increased since 2007."
According to Krosnick, this explanation is especially significant, because it suggests that the recent decline in the proportion of people who believe in global warming is likely to be temporary. "If the Earth's temperature begins to rise again, these individuals may reverse course and rejoin the large majority who still think warming is real," he said.
Several questions in the June survey addressed the so-called "climategate" controversy, which made headlines in late 2009 and early 2010.
"Growing public skepticism has, in recent months, been attributed to news reports about email messages hacked from the computer system at the University of East Anglia in Britain – characterized as showing climate scientists colluding to silence unconvinced colleagues – and by the discoveries of alleged flaws in reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPPC]," Krosnick said. "Our survey discredited this claim in multiple ways."
For example, only 9 percent of respondents said they knew about the East Anglia email messages and believed they indicate that climate scientists should not be trusted, and only 13 percent said the same about the controversial IPPC reports.
"Overall, we found no decline in Americans' trust in environmental scientists," Krosnick said. "Fully 71 percent of respondents said they trust scientists a moderate amount, a lot or completely."
In the June 2010 survey, 86 percent of respondents said they wanted the federal government to limit the amount of air pollution that businesses emit, and 76 percent favored government limitations on greenhouse gas emissions generated by businesses. Only 14 percent said that the United States should not take action to combat global warming unless other major industrial countries like China and India do so as well.
Among other survey results:
- 78 percent opposed taxes on electricity to reduce consumption, and 72 percent opposed taxes on gasoline.
- 84 percent favored the federal government offering tax breaks to encourage utilities to make more electricity from water, wind and solar power.
- Four out of 5 respondents favored government requiring or offering tax breaks to encourage the production of cars that use less gas (81 percent), appliances that use less electricity (80 percent) and homes and office buildings that require less energy to heat and cool (80 percent).
- Only 18 percent said that policies to reduce global warming would increase unemployment.
These results create a unique opportunity for elected officials, according to Krosnick. On Thursday, June 10, the U.S. Senate is scheduled to vote on a resolution by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) that would reverse the Environmental Protection Agency's plans to limit greenhouse gas emissions by American businesses.
"When senators vote on Thursday, there is one number they might want to keep in mind: 72 percent of Americans think that most business leaders do not want the federal government to take steps to stop global warming," Krosnick said. "But a vote to eliminate greenhouse gas regulation is likely to be perceived by the nation as a vote for industry and against the will of the people."
Mark Shwartz is communications manager at the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University.
Krosnick will present the results of his latest survey on Thursday, June 10, 2-3:30 p.m. EDT, at an Environmental and Energy Study Institute briefing in Washington, D.C.
Mike Murphy, Woods Institute for the Environment: (415) 652-5479 (cell), firstname.lastname@example.org
Mark Shwartz, Woods Institute for the Environment: (650) 723-9296, email@example.com