| 1 min readEarth & Climate

Study finds unhealthy air in gas-powered commercial kitchens

Researchers recorded extreme heat and elevated nitrogen dioxide in restaurant kitchens using gas or propane appliances. The all-electric kitchens studied ran cooler and cleaner.

A gloved chef holds a flaming pan over a gas stove's blue flame in a restaurant kitchen.
Getty Images

In brief

  • Stanford researchers measured air pollutants and heat during service and overnight in 27 commercial kitchens across three states.
  • The study found gas and propane kitchens exceeded health-based guidelines, while all-electric kitchens remained cooler and cleaner.
  • Findings underscore the health implications of equipment choices for millions of U.S. restaurant workers, particularly cleaning crews and early-arriving staff exposed to pilot-light emissions.

Restaurant workers in commercial kitchens with gas and propane appliances can face heat and air pollution at levels above health-based guidelines, according to a new study published in Environmental Research Letters.

The peer-reviewed study is the first U.S. analysis to compare air quality and heat exposures in commercial kitchens equipped with gas-fired appliances to those that are all-electric under real-world working conditions.

The study authors measured nitrogen dioxide (NO2), benzene, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, and air temperature in areas where employees work during restaurant service and overnight. The research, based on measurements from 21 gas kitchens, three propane kitchens, and three all-electric kitchens across California, Pennsylvania, and New York, has implications for workers across the U.S. restaurant and food industry, which employs an estimated 15.7 million people. About 5 million of those employees spend all of their working hours in the kitchen.

“Commercial kitchens have received much less attention than home kitchens for measuring indoor pollution,” said study co-author Rob Jackson, a professor of Earth system science at the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability. “Our study shows that burning gas in a restaurant kitchen is as suspect as burning it in our homes. All-electric kitchens emitted none of the pollution we saw in kitchens burning gas.”

While no all-electric kitchen exceeded health guidelines for pollution exposure during cooking hours, researchers recorded one or more exceedances in most kitchens with gas or propane appliances. For NO2, a pollutant associated with higher risk of asthma, approximately 70% of the gas kitchens exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) one-hour outdoor air standard of 100 parts per billion by volume (ppbv) during working hours. In one kitchen, a 15-minute average NO2 measurement exceeded 1,000 ppbv, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health’s recommended limit for short-term workplace exposure. Concentrations of carbon monoxide and the known human carcinogen benzene exceeded California’s 1-hour exposure guidelines in three and five gas kitchens, respectively.

“Very few studies have measured what cooks and chefs breathe during a normal shift,” said lead author Yannai Kashtan, MS ’22, PhD ’24, a former member of Jackson’s lab at Stanford who is now an air quality scientist at PSE Healthy Energy. “In some gas kitchens, we observed that several pollutants exceeded health-based guidelines, while the all-electric kitchens ran cooler and cleaner than those using gas or propane appliances.”

The study also provides new evidence of an exposure pathway from gas appliance pilot lights that consistently remain lit, raising concerns for cleaning crews and early-arriving staff. Approximately 71% of the gas kitchens with overnight monitoring recorded higher levels of NO2, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, and benzene overnight, when ventilation was off and pilot lights remained lit, than during restaurant service. Seven kitchens exceeded the 100 ppbv NO2 standard during off-work hours. None of the all-electric kitchens exceeded pollutant thresholds overnight.

The study found kitchens equipped with gas-fired appliances frequently exceeded heat-based health benchmarks. Approximately 68% of the gas kitchens with temperature data exceeded 90 F (32 C), the proposed federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) high-heat threshold. Ten of those exceeded 100 F (37 C), and four exceeded 122 F (50 C).

Even when outdoor temperatures remained below 75 F (23 C), 10 of 13 gas kitchens exceeded 90 F (32 C) indoors, suggesting that heat generated inside the kitchen, rather than hot weather alone, drove the extreme indoor conditions. To get a closer look at the heat an individual worker may experience, the team attached a temperature monitor to a chef’s shoulder during a roughly five-hour controlled cooking session. The monitor recorded an average temperature of 92 F (33 C) and a peak of 106 F (41 C).

“Restaurant kitchens are demanding and oftentimes inhospitable workplaces that our staff are expected to work hard in. They shouldn’t have to sacrifice their health by accepting excessive heat or polluted air as part of the job,” said study co-author and chef Christopher Galarza. “This study gives restaurant owners and chefs better information about the conditions inside commercial kitchens and the role equipment choices can play in creating healthier workplaces.”

For more information

Jackson is the Michelle and Kevin Douglas Provostial Professor at the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability. He is also a senior fellow at the school’s Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment and Stanford Precourt Institute for Energy. He is faculty director of Electrification for Health, a program of the Stanford Center for Human and Planetary Health that works to protect human health through clean electric systems that reduce air pollution indoors and outdoors and meet people’s energy needs.

Study co-authors include Colin Finnegan and Abi Shankute. Finnegan is a lab manager and Shankute is a research assistant in the Jackson Lab in the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability’s Department of Earth System Science.

Co-authors not mentioned above are affiliated with PSE Healthy Energy and New York University. Galarza is affiliated with Forward Dining Solutions and EcoChef Certification.

This research was supported by PSE Healthy Energy and the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability.

This article was adapted from a press release published by PSE Healthy Energy.

This story was originally published by Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability.

Media contacts

Rob Jackson, Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability: 650-497-5841, rob.jackson@stanford.edu
Josie Garthwaite, Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability: 650-497-0947, josieg@stanford.edu
Rob Jordan, Woods Institute for the Environment: 650-721-1881, rjordan@stanford.edu

Author

PSE Healthy Energy

Share this story