1 min readSustainability

A simple idea to bring clean drinking water to U.S. homes at a lower cost

Stanford engineer Khalid Osman and collaborators are building modeling tools to help water system managers find the most cost-effective option for improving their community’s drinking water.

The Flint Water Plant, a tan brick building with a large white water tower behind it and a U.S. flag flying out front under an overcast sky.
The water plant serving Flint, Michigan, is pictured in 2016. The city had recently switched to a new water supply that proved corrosive, causing lead from old pipes to leach into tap water and exposing tens of thousands of residents to contaminants. | Linda Parton / Getty Images

In brief

  • Over 21,000 water systems in the U.S. violated at least one federal standard for safe drinking water in 2022. In addition, 3,500 had health-based violations.
  • Many water system managers can’t afford major upgrades or lack the technical expertise to quickly identify the most cost-effective path forward, which delays action.
  • With support from the Stanford Sustainability Accelerator, researchers built two digital tools that quickly model the cost and feasibility of improving versus merging systems.
  • Collaborating with a nonprofit sped up progress and will help the team deliver both tools to a network of water system managers, regulators, and experts across the U.S.

“Oftentimes, problems go neglected, and then consumers have to contend with drinking water that might not be of the highest quality,” said Khalid Osman, an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford who studies water management, conservation, and community access to clean water.

Water managers must notify consumers when testing reveals violations of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Not all violations mean the water is unsafe to drink. They range from acute health risks, such as E. coli or high levels of contaminants like lead and copper, to less serious violations, like missing reporting deadlines.

Water system managers typically have two options for improving their systems to prevent further violations: pay for upgrades, or combine infrastructure, operations, or management with a nearby system that has the resources to address safety issues. Both options can be costly, and weighing the tradeoffs can be complex and time-consuming, leaving many communities with no choice but to delay action or do nothing.

The EPA offers spreadsheets that can help water managers calculate the costs of different upgrade options, but when Osman and his lab members talked to managers from water systems of all sizes, they heard the same story: The EPA tools aren’t user-friendly, and many people don’t have the software needed to run calculations. This is especially true in many small communities where utilities are run by a “mom-and-pop shop” or someone with a day job who manages the water system on the side, said Osman.

Osman saw an opportunity to integrate existing public datasets on household income, the age of water-treatment infrastructure, water system boundaries, and other information that could affect a community’s ability to bring its system into compliance.

“If we could get all the data to talk to each other, what would it tell us?” Osman said. “And then how could we use that to create solutions?”

In 2025, Osman and Greg Pierce, senior director of the Human Right to Water Solutions Lab at UCLA, received funding from the Stanford Sustainability Accelerator, based in the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability, to build modeling tools that could help water managers find the best solutions for their communities.

The more small systems we can help make these decisions, the more efficient water systems broadly across the nation will be.
Khalid OsmanAssistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Osman and Pierce are currently testing a pair of complementary, web-based tools. One tool allows users to search for systems that are good candidates for consolidation, based on parameters such as population and number of violations. The tool generates a map of compliant systems nearby that a non-compliant system could join and estimates the cost for each potential consolidation.

Another tool enables users to enter basic information about a given system’s contaminants and view potential treatment costs.

Jeff Brown, a managing director at the accelerator who supports researchers working on innovations in water and greenhouse gas removal, helped Osman and Pierce think more broadly about who might benefit from easier access to better data.

Early on in the project, Pierce reached out to the Environmental Policy Innovation Center, or EPIC, a nonprofit startup focused on fast-tracking policy solutions that has built a nationwide network, including water experts, policymakers, and water-system managers. The accelerator’s support and encouragement to consider a broad array of stakeholders helped them see EPIC as their ideal collaborator, Osman said.

“They have such amazing reach that it gives us a lot of confidence that once we’re ready to launch this tool, it will get out into the hands of the right people,” Osman said.

At a water-themed workshop the accelerator hosted in October 2025, Brown also connected the team with other Stanford researchers focused on providing clean drinking water and a member of the California State Water Board.

Emerging solutions

Osman and Pierce continued building relationships with system managers, water board members, community advocacy organizations, engineering consulting firms, and consultants who work with water systems. As they gathered feedback, the researchers expanded their vision: Rather than build a tool just for water managers, they wanted to create something that various groups could use to inform their work on water system improvements.

The team was also determined to find an approach that would work at scale across the country.

“The more small systems we can help make these decisions, the more efficient water systems broadly across the nation will be,” Osman said.

The collaboration with EPIC helped move the project from an idea to a prototype in less than a year. The team demoed the tools for system managers and other stakeholders during the spring of 2026 and is now working to refine and release free, public versions of the tools in 2027. 

Pierce, who has worked on several projects related to mapping and fixing noncompliant water systems, said collaboration across disciplines and institutions is key to developing solutions that can work on a national scale.

“A lot of people have estimated the size of the problem, but not a lot of people have estimated how the solution could be implemented and what the cost of it would be, to motivate a final push to make sure everyone has safe drinking water in the United States,” Pierce said.

Osman said he hopes the team’s work to help communities improve their water systems inspires other people to address related issues, such as limited water supplies and contaminants like microplastics.

“Our work can be part of creating national dialogue around having clean, healthy, and affordable drinking water for everybody,” he said.

For more information

Civil and Environmental Engineering is a joint department of the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability and the School of Engineering.

UCLA received funding from Liquid IV to continue its portion of the work and complement funding from the accelerator.

This story was originally published by Stanford Sustainability Accelerator.