Stanford study of abandoned oil and gas wells reveals new ways of identifying and fixing the worst methane emitters
New research finds far more abandoned oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania than previously thought and provides a framework for identifying wells across the United States and globally that are the worst methane leakers.
A small percentage of abandoned oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania produces the vast majority of the state’s methane emissions, according to Stanford and Princeton scientists and their colleagues. The work in Pennsylvania, which has the longest history of oil and gas development in the United States, could help scientists learn how to identify and fix high emitting wells nationwide.
The findings, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is the largest study of high methane-emitting abandoned oil and gas wells in the state, which has oil and gas infrastructure dating back to 1859. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that is about 30 times more effective at trapping solar heat over a 100-year period compared to carbon dioxide.
“Our findings will help states prioritize where to spend their money and find the highest-emitting wells more easily,” said study co-author Rob Jackson, the Michelle and Kevin Douglas Provostial Professor at Stanford’s School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences. “If you want to reduce climate change quickly, methane provides a great opportunity.”
Previous research conducted at Princeton by Mary Kang, a postdoctoral associate in Jackson’s lab and the first author of the new study, determined that abandoned wells in Pennsylvania contribute a significant amount of methane to the atmosphere and should be factored into state and national greenhouse-gas emissions inventories. However, the sheer number of abandoned wells, combined with poor documentation and record-keeping, made it difficult to even know how many wells existed, much less develop reasonable strategies for mitigation.
Kang, Jackson and their colleagues at Princeton, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Ohio State University combined new field measurements from 88 wells in Pennsylvania with information gathered from old books, published literature, historical state documents and modern databases to paint a more accurate picture of both the number of abandoned wells and the traits of highest emitters.
One of the study’s main findings is that there are likely many more abandoned wells in Pennsylvania than previously thought — 475,000 to 700,000 in total, up from previous estimates of 300,000 to 500,000.
“Many of these enhanced recovery wells date as far back as the 19th century and were never documented, but have now been rediscovered,” Kang said.
The researchers calculated that the combined emissions output of all of the abandoned wells in Pennsylvania added up to an estimated 50,000 tonnes of methane per year — equal to about 5 to 8 percent of Pennsylvania’s annual greenhouse gas emissions.
“It’s not the dominant source of methane in Pennsylvania, but these wells keep emitting for years, even decades,” said Jackson, who is also a senior fellow at both the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment and the Precourt Institute for Energy.
Of the abandoned wells that were examined, a few seemed to be emitting methane at especially high rates — a finding consistent with another recent Stanford study which showed that a small number of wells are responsible for the bulk of the country’s methane emissions. The worst culprits in Pennsylvania appear to be a subset of natural gas wells that have been left open and unplugged, and also plugged gas wells that run through coal mines and require vents to release pressure.
“You could seal the vast majority of emissions just by addressing 5 to 10 percent of the wells,” said Jackson, who is affiliated with Stanford’s campus-wide Natural Gas Initiative (NGI), which is devoted to addressing questions and funding projects related to the tremendous growth in natural gas production in the past decade.
The researchers also found that methane emissions from the “super emitter” wells often had a unique chemical makeup: They tended to contain larger amounts of noble gases, including a certain isotope of helium, as well as higher concentrations of thermogenic gases, which are produced deep in the ground at high temperatures and pressures, rather than biogenic gases produced by microorganisms.
“This information is useful for determining methane sources and leakage pathways, which can help us figure out ways to best stop the leaks,” Kang said. For example, she pointed out that the chemical signature of a well’s emissions could indicate that only specific portions of the well require repair rather than plugging the entire length of the well, which is expensive.
The standard way of plugging a well involves pouring cement to create a combination of deep and shallow plugs: one throughout each oil, gas, coal, or water-bearing layer, and another at the surface to isolate drinking water. “Technically, we know exactly how to fix them,” Kang said. “The problem is it’s not cheap to do so.”
The new findings highlight a need to develop more effective mitigation strategies at the wells themselves to address the most problematic sections of damaged wells, the authors say.
“In a way that’s good news – if we can identify the super emitters quickly and cheaply, we can address most of the problems,” Jackson said.
The researchers hope to use the new data mining and field measurement techniques they’ve developed in this latest research to identify high emitters across the country and abroad. “We need a lot more data in many more locations,” Jackson said. “This is an issue across the United States and it’s an issue in other parts of the world, too.”
Other co-authors on the study, “Identification and characterization of high methane-emitting abandoned oil and gas wells,” include Shanna Christian, Michael Celia, Denise Mauzerall, Alana Miller and Yuheng Chen of Princeton University; Markus Bill and Mark Conrad of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; and Thomas Darrah of Ohio State University.
Research was supported by grants from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Vulcan Inc.
To submit information about abandoned oil and gas wells on your property, email Robert Jackson at email@example.com.