Stanford University

News Service


NEWS RELEASE

6/3/98

CONTACT: Kathleen O'Toole, News Service (650) 725-1939;
e-mail [email protected]

Professors urge U.N. to critically assess costs of global drug war

At least 10 Stanford or Hoover scholars are among a group of prominent Americans signing an open letter to the United Nations secretary general urging him to initiate a critical review of the international drug war when the General Assembly holds a special session on drugs June 8-10 in New York.

"We believe that the global war on drugs is now causing more harm than drug abuse itself," the signers, organized by Hoover Institution Research Fellow Joseph McNamara, say.

The letter, to be published in national newspapers before the General Assembly meeting, is signed by, among others, Donald Kennedy, president emeritus of Stanford and professor of biological sciences; Roger Noll, professor of economics and director of the public policy program; John Ferejohn, professor of political science and senior fellow at Hoover; sociologist Alex Inkeles, senior fellow emeritus at Hoover; economists Melvin Krauss and Thomas Moore, both senior fellows at Hoover; Miguel Mendez, professor of law; political scientist William Ratliff of Hoover; and Dr. Mark Vierra, assistant professor of surgery.

McNamara said he was seeking more signers for the letter, which also has been signed by former Sen. Alan Cranston, D-Calif.; federal judges Robert Sweet of New York and John Kane of Denver; and San Francisco District Attorney Terence Hallinan. McNamara, whose own research is focused on the drug war, has organized several conferences to bring together politicians, law enforcement officers, medical doctors and social scientists to discuss more effective policies for reducing the harm of drug addiction and marketing.

The letter urges U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan to lead a "frank and honest evaluation of global drug control efforts." It points out that U.N. and government policies on drug control have focused on criminalization and punishment without much success.

"U.N. agencies estimate the annual revenue generated by the illegal drug industry at $400 million, or the equivalent of roughly 8 percent of total international trade. This industry has empowered organized criminals, corrupted governments at all levels, eroded internal security, stimulated violence and distorted both economic markets and moral values. These are the consequences not of the drug use per se, but of decades of failed and futile drug war policies," the signers assert.

Because the signers include prominent people with differing political and professional backgrounds, McNamara said he hopes the letter "can influence the U.N. to at least do more than run a program fixed by the DEA [U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration]. The publicity surrounding the ads may well be the first step in forcing a debate on an irrational and essentially un-American policy which we all know can never work."

A full text of the letter follows:

Dear Secretary General,
On the occasion of the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on Drugs in New York on June 8-10, 1998, we seek your leadership in stimulating a frank and honest evaluation of global drug control efforts.
We are all deeply concerned about the threat that drugs pose to our children, our fellow citizens and our societies. There is no choice but to work together, both within our countries and across borders, to reduce the harms associated with drugs. The United Nations has a legitimate and important role to play in this regard ­ but only if it is willing to ask and address tough questions about the success or failure of its efforts.
We believe that the global war on drugs is now causing more harm than drug abuse itself.
Every decade the United Nations adopts new international conventions, focused largely on criminalization and punishment, that restrict the ability of individual nations to devise effective solutions to local drug problems. Every year governments enact more punitive and costly drug control measures. Every day politicians endorse harsher new drug war strategies.
What is the result? U.N. agencies estimate the annual revenue generated by the illegal drug industry at $400 billion, or the equivalent of roughly eight per cent of total international trade. This industry has empowered organized criminals, corrupted governments at all levels, eroded internal security, stimulated violence, and distorted both economic markets and moral values. These are the consequences not of drug use per se, but of decades of failed and futile drug war policies.
In many parts of the world, drug war politics impede public health efforts to stem the spread of HIV, hepatitis and other infectious diseases. Human rights are violated, environmental assaults perpetrated and prisons inundated with hundreds of thousands of drug law violators. Scarce resources better expended on health, education and economic development are squandered on ever more expensive interdiction efforts. Realistic proposals to reduce drug-related crime, disease and death are abandoned in favor of rhetorical proposals to create drug-free societies.
Persisting in our current policies will only result in more drug abuse, more empowerment of drug markets and criminals, and more disease and suffering. Too often those who call for open debate, rigorous analysis of current policies, and serious consideration of alternatives are accused of "surrendering." But the true surrender is when fear and inertia combine to shut off debate, suppress critical analysis, and dismiss all alternatives to current policies.
Mr. Secretary General, we appeal to you to initiate a truly open and honest dialogue regarding the future of global drug control policies ­ one in which fear, prejudice and punitive prohibitions yield to common sense, science, public health and human rights.

-30-

By Kathleen O'Toole


© Stanford University. All Rights Reserved. Stanford, CA 94305. (650) 723-2300. Terms of Use  |  Copyright Complaints