Stanford University

News Service


NEWS RELEASE

9/11/03

Lisa Trei, News Service: (650) 725-0224, lisatrei@stanford.edu

Appendix to the Stanford University/Knowledge Networks California Ballot Survey

Survey Results

The results below are presented in two sections: (i) for all respondents and (ii) for respondents indicating that they are registered to vote and are likely to vote in the special election.

(i)All Respondents (N=852)

Should Gray Davis be recalled as governor?

Yes 58% (493)
No 42% (355)

Recall vote by Party
  Dem Rep Ind/Other
Yes 40% (127) 87% (200) 55% (164)
No 59% (187) 13% (31) 45% (134)

If the governor is recalled, the candidate who receives the most votes will be elected as the new governor. Please select the candidate that you are most likely to vote for.
McClintock 6%
Huffington 2%
Bustamante 24%

Schwarzenegger

37%

Ueberroth 4%
Other (Write-ins) 14%

Candidate Preference by Party
  Dem Rep Ind/Other
Bustamante 47% 5% 15%
Schwarzenegger 19% 60% 38%

Candidate Preference by Gender

  Male Female
Bustamante 22% 26%
Schwarzenegger 37% 36%

Candidate Preference by Race/Ethnicity
  A-Am White Hispan Other
Bustamante 36% 22% 32% 9%
Schwarzenegger 22% 41% 30% 43%

(ii)Registered Voters Only (N=528)

Should Gray Davis be recalled as governor?
Yes 62% (329)
No 38% (199)

Recall vote by Party
  Dem Rep Ind/Other
Yes 42% (86) 91% (158) 57% (85)
No 58% (118) 9% (16) 43% (64)

If the governor is recalled, the candidate who receives the most votes will be elected as the new governor. Please select the candidate that you are most likely to vote for.
McClintock 8%
Huffington 1%
Bustamante 28%

Schwarzenegger

40%
Ueberroth 7%

Candidate Preference by Party
  Dem Rep Ind/Other
Bustamante 55% 3% 22%
Schwarzenegger 19% 61% 47%

Candidate Preference by Gender:
  Male Female
Bustamante 26% 30%
Schwarzenegger 43% 38%

Candidate Preference by Race/Ethnicity
  A-Am White Hispan Other
Bustamante 62% 24% 40% 17%
Schwarzenegger 10% 42% 37% 48%

Methodological Note

The poll was conducted Aug. 29 to Sept. 8 using Knowledge Networks' web-enabled panel, which provides a representative sample of Californian households. Of the 1,429 adults invited to participate in the survey, 852 (60%) completed the survey in time for inclusion in the analysis. Of these, 549 (64%) respondents reported an intention to vote in the special election. Of these, 528 (96%) reported to be registered voters. The margin of error for the total sample of 852 adults is 3.4 percentage points. The margin of error for the sample of 528 registered and likely voters is 4.3 percentage points.

The candidate question was presented to replicate the question on the ballot. The 135 candidates were listed in the order determined by the California Secretary of State's alphabet drawing held Aug. 11, 2003. The official candidate list was rotated 80 times to represent the 80 State Assembly Districts in conformance with the Secretary of State's rotation plan. The option for a write-in candidate was presented last. Once the candidate list was rotated 80 times, it was returned to the candidate list for State Assembly District 1, and again rotated 80 times. This cycle was repeated for all interviews. Since there are more than 80 candidates, not every name has a chance to be displayed at the top of the list. For each candidate, the name and party affiliation were shown.

The survey results were weighted to U.S. Census population benchmarks for adults residing in the State of California in terms of age, race/ethnicity, education obtainment, and urban/rural.

© Stanford University. All Rights Reserved. Stanford, CA 94305. (650) 723-2300. Terms of Use  |  Copyright Complaints