CONTACT: Stanford University News Service (650) 723-2558
Effects of increasing heterogeneity in workplace studied
STANFORD -- As greater numbers of women, ethnic minorities and other "nontraditional" employees join the workforce, the increasing heterogeneity of employee groups has had a greater negative effect on white males than on nonwhites or women, researchers say.
Work done by Anne S. Tsui and Terri D. Egan of the University of California-Irvine, and Charles A. O'Reilly III of the Stanford Graduate School of Business, found that men in homogeneous work units reported the highest commitment to their jobs. But, the researchers said, the commitment of white males fell off as work groups became more heterogeneous. As the homogeneous makeup of their work groups eroded, white male workers became less closely attached to their fellow workers; they had higher rates of absence and reported a lower intention of staying with the firm.
In their study, Tsui, Egan and O'Reilly, professor of human resources management and organizational behavior, found that diversity didn't have as strong an effect on women and minorities as it did on white male workers. In fact, women who worked primarily with men became more strongly attached to their work unit. The attachment of all Caucasians decreased as more minorities were included in the group, while nonwhites showed no less attachment to their work unit when they were in the minority.
"It may be that the lack of reaction by women and nonwhites to being different is conditioned by their changing social status," the authors wrote. "Women and minority employees in this sample may hold higher-status jobs that historically were dominated by men and whites. Conversely, the negative reaction of men and whites may reflect a perception of diminished status."
Tsui, Egan and O'Reilly conclude that heterogeneous groups need to be studied from the viewpoint of the majority as well as the minority. Researchers should devote more attention to the adjustment process of the dominant group rather than restrict their research to "how women and people of color fit the dominant culture," they wrote.
"Equally important are the interactions among individuals who are demographically different," they wrote. "We know little about the communication structure, conflict and influence styles, and decision approaches of heterogeneous versus homogeneous groups."
While heterogeneous groups appear best at tasks that require creativity and judgment, they noted, these groups can also decrease cohesiveness and increase turnover in firms. Managers, it seems, face a difficult balancing act.
The three researchers surveyed 1,705 workers in three large organizations: two Fortune 100 firms and a state agency that operates mental health hospitals. The workers were men and women, white and nonwhite, supervisors and nonsupervisors.
This is an archived release.
This release is not available in any other form.
Images mentioned in this release are not available online.