December 14, 2004
Geophysicists debate the cause of hotspots
By Dawn Levy
Most volcanoes happen at junctures where great slabs of the Earth's rocky surface—called tectonic plates—slide under, over or past each other. But the Earth also sports dozens of anomalous "hotspots"—volcanic regions that scientists can't explain simply using plate tectonics. Hotspots can happen in the middle of oceanic plates—Hawaii is a case in point. Or they can occur amid continental plates—Yellowstone, for example, smokes and spews far from the grinding edges of tectonic plates. Other hotspots, such as Iceland, display volcanism greatly exceeding what geologists would expect at a mid-ocean ridge where plates are moving apart from one another.
On Dec. 15 in San Francisco's Moscone Center, four scientists attending the 2004 meeting of the American Geophysical Union will debate the cause of hotspots at a press conference titled "Plumes or Not?" Professors Norman H. Sleep of Stanford University and Donald J. DePaolo of the University of California-Berkeley will posit that plumes of hot material rising from the deep mantle, possibly as deep as the Earth's core, are the best explanation for hotspots. Professors Gillian R. Foulger of the University of Durham (in the United Kingdom) and James H. Natland of the University of Miami will argue that models based on shallow processes better fit the data for many hotspots.
"Hotspots reveal that we don't know what's happening in the deep Earth," says Sleep, who has received funding from the National Science Foundation to study the base of the lithosphere—the rocky rind encircling the Earth's mantle like the tough skin of an onion. "Plumes are probably what's causing the majority of these hotspots, but they're not well understood."
Plume advocates paint a picture of searing material rising from the planet's deep interior to reach the base of the lithosphere. "If the plate is moving, it's like moving your hand over a candle," Sleep says. "Slowly you get a series of burns."
Plume skeptics, by contrast, advocate that small cracks produced by stress in a plate let magma out. "In the crack and magma theory, you have partial melt everywhere beneath the lithosphere—very widespread," Sleep explains. Cracks propagate in regions such as the Basin and Range Province, where land from Idaho to Mexico and from California to Utah has been stretched out. Here the crust thins. Cracks form and magma pushes through, creating hotspots.
While a crack and magma are required to make a volcano, Sleep says, "the [question] is whether the crack is a secondary feature or the primary one."
Canadian geophysicist J. Tuzo Wilson came up with the hotspot theory in 1963 to explain long-lived volcanic activity in certain regions of the world, such as the Hawaiian Islands. Magma forced through cracks creates volcanoes. Volcanism could only sustain itself over long periods if hotspots existed below the plates. In 1971, W. Jason Morgan of Princeton built on the hotspot theory by proposing that ridges and volcanoes could form when an oceanic plate passes over a hot mantle plume.
At Hawaii, a stationary spot deep in the mantle persistently produces magma, lighter than surrounding rock, that erupts onto the surface and forms new land. Driven by plate movement, eventually the newly formed land moves on, becoming cut off from its hotspot. The magma then gets forced through different cracks to form even newer land. That process is recorded in the rocks of Hawaii's Big Island, which sports active volcanoes, and islands further away, such as Oahu, now inactive and eroding, and the Midway Islands, which have subsided almost to sea level.
Ironically, in the 1970s Sleep had been a major proponent of the crack hypothesis, which had been proposed as early as the 1800s. But he changed his mind around 1985 when he was trying to explain the swell of the Hawaiian Islands—a region of uplifted seafloor that extends hundreds of kilometers roughly east of the Big Island. He decided the crack hypothesis required contrivances that made it "too complicated to be true." With the plume hypothesis, as the plate moves over the plume, it drags plume material with it "just like smoke out of a chimney gets dragged in the wind," says Sleep, who had intended to show that it was a geometric impossibility for plumes to form the uplifted region.
"My 'proof of impossibility' explained its shape—literally on the first plot I did," Sleep laughs. "I didn't have an absurdity at all. I had evidence for plumes."
The other major line of evidence supporting the plume hypothesis is from the four or five spots on Earth where hotspots cross ridges. Plumes can cross ridges without any problem, but it doesn't make a lot of sense for a propagating crack to cross a ridge axis, Sleep says.
Still, he says, there's a place for cracks in the big picture. "Cracks are a mechanism that produces minor hotspots and modulates the hotspots that we actually have. ... We also may have small hotspots that are cracks that aren't associated with plumes. And we definitely have hotspots that are secondary ones that are produced from the plume material flowing toward the ridge axis."