Print

Integrated systems improve medical care, control costs, according to Enthoven

Alain Enthoven

Alain Enthoven

BY ALICE LAPLANTE

Integrating systems to share medical histories, create interdisciplinary medical teams and update doctors on the latest medical research findings could trim healthcare costs while improving patient care, according to Alain Enthoven, the Marriner S. Eccles Professor of Public and Private Management, Emeritus, at the Graduate School of Business.

Proposals to move away from managed care and encourage consumers to choose the best doctor for their condition would be a mistake, Enthoven said. Instead, he calls for creating integrated-delivery systems, a more encompassing version of managed care, to bring coordinated healthcare to U.S. consumers, who currently spend more than $1.7 trillion each year on healthcare.

"We need systems to ensure that healthcare providers are delivering the best care at the lowest possible cost," said Enthoven, who argues that the safest, most appropriate and most affordable care does not come from patients visiting individual providers.

Instead, he says, efficient integrated healthcare systems generally are found in large multispecialty medical group practices with transparent links to hospitals, labs and pharmacies. These organizations provide complete care—from the doctor's office to the hospital to home care, and everything in between. They often have their own insurance arms and work under contracts in which they agree to deliver comprehensive medical services to consumers for a fixed-dollar amount. Examples of integrated-delivery systems include Kaiser Permanente and the Mayo Clinic.

"It's a complex notion, but one that promises to keep healthcare costs under control while increasing the quality of care for the patient," Enthoven said.

When asked, most doctors say they prefer a system that lets each doctor or small group of doctors work independently in their own offices. The model works against sharing information, best practices or any systemized way to track the overall healthcare activities of a particular patient. And it is precisely this model of healthcare that is causing costs to escalate out of control, Enthoven asserts.

The moral hazard prevalent in all health insurance (from the effect of insurance on decisions to use medical care) is exacerbated by the fee-for-service method of payment that rewards doctors financially for doing more, whether or not the added work benefits the patient.

Integrated-delivery systems mitigate moral hazard because, usually, the doctors are salaried and do not get more money by doing more diagnostics. Instead, they prosper by keeping you well, Enthoven said. "Doctors need incentives to use resources wisely."

Managed care is one such incentive, but the concept took on negative connotations in the 1990s, when for-profit insurance companies attempted to limit costs by imposing treatment rules enforced by non-medical administrators. That sort of model is almost inevitably doomed to failure, Enthoven said. "The success of managed care depends on who does the managing. If care is being managed by doctors, then you're typically talking about an IDS [integrated-delivery system]."

The emergence of a concept called "evidence-based medicine" is also pointing toward an integrated-delivery system as the best possible solution for today's healthcare woes, Enthoven said. More than 10,000 randomized controlled clinical trials are performed every year. Medical care should be based on the results of this and other research, and not on what a doctor learned in medical school—which can be years, if not decades, out of date. "Typically, new science doesn't get incorporated into medical practices for 17 years. It's a very serious problem, and one of the reasons that systems are needed," Enthoven said.

Yet it is extremely difficult for individual doctors to keep up with scientific literature. They need some sort of organized help—the kind of help provided within an integrated-delivery system. "If you look at Veterans Affairs or Kaiser Permanente, they have created organizations within their organizations whose job it is to gather and review the research literature and make recommendations for best practices and procedures," said Enthoven, who argues that it is critical that the review and resulting recommendations come from practicing doctors who have credibility, not administrators.

One way that integrated-delivery systems manage costs is through holistic disease management programs, in which trained health professionals take over many of the duties formerly performed by doctors. For example, the job of helping a patient manage his or her diabetes can be handled by a team of medical professionals including nurses, educators and nutritionists who can provide lifestyle coaching, mentoring and routine checkups—things that previously a doctor did at a much higher cost, Enthoven said.

A critical part of integrated-delivery systems has to do with information. Such systems compile comprehensive medical records over time, so when a patient shows up in the doctor's office, the doctor has a complete medical history—all checkups, lab results, X-rays, drugs prescribed and diagnoses made. This is not available in the traditional solo practice sector. There, no doctor has a complete picture of the patient's medical history. There is a great deal of talk now about innovations to correct this, but they will not come easily, Enthoven said.

Indeed, integrated-delivery systems have been leading the country in the use of electronic healthcare records. Last year, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services unveiled a plan to develop an independent information network that will carry electronic medical records. In addition, a compromise version of two health-information technology bills has cleared the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee with bipartisan support.

"In the full implementation of an online clinical information system, the doctor can not only call up test results—which have much less likelihood of getting lost—but also obtain practice guidelines that explain what should be done for a patient with a certain diagnosis," said Enthoven, who argues such information sharing can only increase the quality of healthcare. "A doctor may be terribly smart and terrifically hard working, but he or she can still require support and guidelines from colleagues. Systems make this happen."

Alice LaPlante is a freelance writer. She wrote this article for the Graduate School of Business.