Stanford Report Online   News





Issue of
August 23, 2000


home pageSearch
write us

 


Molecular fingerprinting may lead to new breast cancer treatments  

BY KRISTIN WEIDENBACH

Researchers studying the DNA patterns obtained from different breast tumors have found that each cancer has a unique "molecular fingerprint." In the future, physicians may be able to use this information to design treatment programs specific for each kind of tumor.

Researchers at Stanford and in Norway analyzed 65 breast tumor samples from 42 women. They surveyed 8,102 genes in each of these samples and monitored the activity of the genes to build a biological picture of the gene pattern of each tissue sample. The gene expression patterns obtained from the breast cancer samples were compared with patterns from samples of normal breast tissue.

Using a subset of 496 genes, Chuck Perou, PhD, and his colleagues detected four distinct gene patterns that corresponded to four classes of samples. The researchers specifically selected this subset to include genes that were expressed similarly within the same tumor yet varied among different tumors.

The first pattern that could be reliably identified belonged to samples of normal breast tissue. Normal breast tissue contains two kinds of epithelial cells, basal and luminal. The gene expression pattern associated with normal breast tissue is typified by high expression of genes characteristic of basal epithelial cells and low expression of genes characteristic of luminal epithelial cells.

The second pattern was distinguished mostly by expression of a cancer gene, Erb-B2/HER2. The remaining two groups had features corresponding to the two kinds of epithelial cells. One pattern identified breast tumors derived from luminal epithelial cells and the other identified tumors derived from basal epithelial cells.

According to Perou, basal-cell-derived breast tumors have not traditionally been diagnosed and treated as a distinct group. "Our paper shows that each epithelial cell type gives rise to breast tumors," he said. "It wasn't clinically appreciated before that one cell type, breast basal epithelial cells, gives rise to a significant number of breast tumors."

Most of the study samples of tumors derived from luminal epithelial cells expressed the estrogen receptor gene. The estrogen receptor protein is an important clinical marker that physicians look for when diagnosing breast cancer. The tumors are typically defined as estrogen receptor positive or negative, and patients are assigned a treatment plan accordingly. Unlike the luminal-cell-derived tumors, neither the tumors expressing the cancer gene nor the basal-cell-derived tumors expressed the estrogen receptor gene.

"One of the most practical findings of this study may be that clinically what are described as estrogen receptor negative tumors may be at least two distinct subtypes that are likely derived from two different cell types and therefore should be treated differently," said Perou. "Now that we recognize at least two different diseases, we need to figure out what chemotherapy works best on these different subtypes, which is an important focus of my future research," he added.

The results of the study were published in the August 17 issue of Nature. The authors note in the report of their findings that one of the original goals of the study was to develop a system for classifying tumors based on their gene expression patterns. Two particular aspects of their work indicate to them that monitoring gene expression patterns is a robust technique for classification of breast tumors.

The team was able to study breast tumors from 20 patients, both before and after they underwent a 16-week course of chemotherapy. Some of the tumors shrank to half their original size following the treatment, but their molecular fingerprint hardly varied. "Even though we know these tumors were shrinking by 50 percent or greater, the patterns looked very similar before and after therapy," said Perou. He says that this was somewhat surprising to researchers who expected the gene expression pattern to change as a result of bombarding the cells with anticancer drugs.

But the stability of the pattern is good news for the technique because it shows that the scientists can reliably identify a tumor from among a potentially confusing background of other cell types and follow its progress over time without losing its signal.

For two patients, samples were taken from the primary breast tumor and from lymph nodes to which the tumor had migrated. The molecular fingerprint from each of these samples was very similar, showing that a tumor did not seem to lose its distinctive characteristics upon metastasis and further confirming that each tumor could be reliably recognized. The research team will reveal more about the way the gene expression patterns correlate with clinical data in a separate report to be published later this year.

Perou is a postdoctoral fellow in the laboratory of David Botstein, PhD, professor of genetics. He and other members of Bostein's lab are working closely with researchers in the laboratory of Patrick Brown, MD, PhD, a Howard Hughes investigator and associate professor in biochemistry, developing methods to detect the molecular fingerprints of a variety of human cancers. In addition to breast cancer, the scientists and their clinical collaborators are looking at glioblastoma -- a type of brain tumor -- and cancers of the lung, liver, prostate and ovary.

Additional Stanford co-authors on the Nature report include Matt van de Rijn, MD, PhD, assistant professor of pathology; Stefanie Jeffrey, MD, assistant professor of surgery; postdoctoral fellows Christian Rees, PhD, Jonathan Pollack, MD, PhD, and Douglas Ross, MD, PhD; and research assistants Alexander Pergamenschikov, Cheryl Williams and Shirley Zhu. Michael Eisen, PhD, now at the University of California, Berkeley, contributed to the study when he was a research fellow in Botstein's lab.

The National Cancer Institute and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute provided funding for the study. Perou is a SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals Fellow of the Life Sciences Research Foundation and Ross is a Walter and Idun Berry Fellow. SR