Stanford Report
Online   News





Issue of
June 9, 1999


home pageSearch
write us

 


Educators revisit 20-year-old study of foreign-language education in the U.S.

BY DIANE MANUEL

The changing profile of students who are enrolling in language courses today was one of many issues panelists addressed at a day-long conference about the study of foreign languages on June 2.

Citing the large numbers of children in the United States who are growing up in homes where Vietnamese, Hmong, Cantonese, Korean, Cambodian, Laotian, Tagalog and other languages are spoken, Guadalupe Valdes, professor of education and of Spanish and Portuguese, said that "in comparison to what happened to immigrants in the early part of this century, many heritage speakers today are simply refusing to abandon the language they learn at home.

"They are American and they are also proud of their ethnicity and heritage," she said.

Valdes was one of seven Stanford faculty members who spoke at the conference that was sponsored by the School of Humanities and Sciences, the Stanford Language Center and the Institute for International Studies.

"The Study of Foreign Languages in the New Century: Retrospective Views from 'The President's Commission on Foreign Languages and International Studies' and Prospects for the Future" revisited a report about foreign language learning in the United States that was produced by a commission appointed by President Jimmy Carter in 1979.

"In order to succeed in this country, in order to receive a good education, newly arrived youngsters must learn English ­ no one is questioning that," Valdes told conference participants. "What is not clear, however, is to what degree these students, in order to learn English, must abandon the use of their heritage language."

Valdes argued that for these students to be incorporated into foreign language departments and area studies centers at universities, "they must be seen as worthy of being there." Faculty in those departments and programs, she said, "must endorse their presence and must be willing to work with them."

Heritage language speakers, study abroad programs and the role of foundations and government in foreign language learning were among the issues panelists addressed. Other topics came up as well, including the lingua franca that students absorb in late-night conversations at overseas bars, which drew some of the liveliest discussion and loudest applause.

"The typical haunts of students abroad are bars," Sara Saz, a professor of Spanish from Colorado State University, said in response to one teacher's concern about the vocabulary students may acquire on their own. "Sure, they pick up words they wouldn't learn in the classroom, but it's an experience in diversity, it's extremely valuable and it's another plus of living abroad."

Leon Panetta, former chief of staff for the Clinton White House and a member of the 1979 presidential commission, was the guest speaker at the conference luncheon. After talking about how he had learned Italian at home, from his parents and grandfather, Panetta made a plea for a focused national strategy for language acquisition.

"The fundamental point is that overall this nation is lacking the kind of commitment that it needs to have in order to advance foreign language training," Panetta said.

"If the commission found in its famous conclusion that Americans' incompetence in foreign languages was nothing short of scandalous in 1979, then I'm afraid that my conclusion in 1999 is that while it may not be scandalous, it is at best disappointing for a nation that is crossing the threshold of a global era."

Elizabeth Bernhardt, professor of German studies and director of the Language Center, looked at methodologies for teaching foreign languages and noted that there has been "considerably more emphasis on oral foreign language skills" in the last decade. She called for more research on reading and writing skills and more attention to the articulation of curricula between high schools and universities.

Christina Einstein, a dean for academic affairs at the Graduate School of Business who holds a doctorate in French literature, called the increased emphasis on foreign language courses at the professional school a "victory for students."

"They know recruiters are looking for candidates with solid language skills to be part of the global environment," Einstein said, and so have requested more language courses.

The business school offered seven language courses last year and expects to offer nine next year. As a result, about 14 percent of students currently are enrolled in language courses.

Barbara Freed, professor of French at Carnegie Mellon University, looked at assumptions about the benefits of study abroad and questioned the "magical and mysterious process by which second language learning takes place merely by being on 'foreign' soil.'"

Freed cited the "highly individual nature of students' experiences" and suggested that "the popular notion of the study abroad environment is less uniform than was once believed."

Michael Holquist, professor of comparative literature and Russian studies at Yale University, examined the role of foundations in foreign language study and also spoke about the "class differences" that exist in language departments at most universities.

"No one has done anything sustained to think about negotiating positions between the people in the culture of the universities as they are constituted who are treated as second-class citizens ­ the teachers of foreign languages ­ and the people who have occupied another stratum in the same culture, the people who have taught literature and prepared Ph.D.s."

In his "soft defense" of area studies, Michel Oksenberg, a senior fellow at the Asia/Pacific Research Center, suggested that undergraduates should be encouraged to acquire the skills of the social science disciplines as they pursue expertise in particular geographic areas.

"The increased diversity of university student bodies has introduced a new demand for courses that illuminate their ancestral homes: Korea, Vietnam, west Africa, Cuba, even Guangdong," Oksenberg noted in his paper, which was presented by David Holloway, director of the Institute for International Studies, in his absence.

"Area studies have to change, welcoming to the community those in professional schools and departments who wish to immerse themselves in foreign areas." SR